Jennings v. State

682 So. 2d 144, 1996 WL 627600
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedOctober 31, 1996
Docket87587
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 682 So. 2d 144 (Jennings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jennings v. State, 682 So. 2d 144, 1996 WL 627600 (Fla. 1996).

Opinion

682 So.2d 144 (1996)

Mario Lavon JENNINGS, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.

No. 87587.

Supreme Court of Florida.

October 31, 1996.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender and Chet Kaufman, Assistant Public Defender, *145 Second Judicial Circuit, Tallahassee, for Petitioner.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General; James W. Rogers, Bureau Chief, Criminal Appeals, Senior Assistant Attorney General and Mark C. Menser, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

WELLS, Justice.

We have for review the decision of the district court in Jennings v. State, 667 So.2d 442 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996), which expressly declares a state statute valid. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

Mario Jennings was convicted of one count of selling cocaine within 1000 feet of a school and three counts of possessing cocaine within 1000 feet of a school with the intent to sell. Pursuant to section 893.13(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1993), the sale or possession of cocaine with the intent to sell, although otherwise a second-degree felony, is a first-degree felony if the crime is committed within 1000 feet of a school and occurs "between the hours of 6 a.m. and 12 a.m." (Emphasis added). Since the incidents that gave rise to the convictions occurred on June 29, 1994, at 7:28 p.m. and on July 2, 1994, at 1:20 p.m., Jennings was convicted of a first-degree felony.

On appeal, Jennings argued that the term "12 a.m." in section 893.13(1)(c) is unconstitutionally vague because it fails to put reasonable persons on notice as to whether the period of time in which an offense is subject to reclassification ends at noon or midnight. The First District Court of Appeal affirmed his convictions and held that in context 12 a.m. means midnight.

We agree and adopt the well-reasoned opinion of Judge Benton in the court below. Accordingly, we approve the decision of the district court and sustain that portion of section 893.13(1)(c), Florida Statutes (1993), containing the reference to 12 a.m. against constitutional attack. The statute covers the eighteen-hour period from 6 a.m. until 12 a.m., which is the time that marks the beginning of the next day.

It is so ordered.

KOGAN, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, GRIMES, HARDING and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spry v. State
912 So. 2d 384 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Nichols
892 So. 2d 1221 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Prescott v. State
753 So. 2d 568 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
McCann v. State
711 So. 2d 1290 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
O'Neal v. State
682 So. 2d 1095 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
682 So. 2d 144, 1996 WL 627600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jennings-v-state-fla-1996.