Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/JEJ v. State

JEJ v. State

505 So. 2d 516
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 24, 1987
Docket85-2787
StatusPublished

This text of 505 So. 2d 516 (JEJ v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
JEJ v. State, 505 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

505 So.2d 516 (1987)

J.E.J., Jr., a Child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-2787.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 24, 1987.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Brad Permar Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Gary O. Welch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant's conviction and reject his contention that section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1985), is unconstitutionally vague when applied to children under sixteen years of age. Accordingly, as in L.L.N. v. State, 504 So.2d 6, on rehearing *517 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), we declare section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1985), to be valid.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

LLN v. State
504 So. 2d 6 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
J.E.J. v. State
505 So. 2d 516 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
505 So. 2d 516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jej-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.