Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/JEJ v. State

JEJ v. State

505 So. 2d 516
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in JEJ v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 12 Fla. L. Weekly 885 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 24, 1987·No. 85-2787·Published

Opinion

505 So.2d 516 (1987)

J.E.J., Jr., a Child, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 85-2787.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 24, 1987.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Brad Permar Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Gary O. Welch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appellant's conviction and reject his contention that section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1985), is unconstitutionally vague when applied to children under sixteen years of age. Accordingly, as in L.L.N. v. State, 504 So.2d 6, on rehearing *517 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), we declare section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1985), to be valid.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and HALL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JEJ v. State, 505 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

505 So. 2d 516 (JEJ v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

LLN v. State
504 So. 2d 6 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
J.E.J. v. State
505 So. 2d 516 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)