Jeanty v. Bottini Fuel Oil

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided March 18, 2022·No. 1:21-cv-08316·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KERVIN JEANTY, Plaintiff, 21-CV-8316 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL BOTTINI FUEL OIL, et al., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated November 5, 2021, the Court directed Plaintiff to file an amended complaint within 60 days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of the complaint. On January 18, the Court granted Plaintiff an additional 30 days to file an amended complaint. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the complaint, filed in forma pauperis (IFP) under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), is dismissed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore IFP status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue). The Clerk of Court is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff and note service on the docket. SO ORDERED. Dated: March 18, 2022 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jeanty v. Bottini Fuel Oil, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Jeanty v. Bottini Fuel Oil (Jeanty v. Bottini Fuel Oil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)