J.D. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

J.D. v. State

693 So. 2d 146, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5854, 1997 WL 280779

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 28, 1997

DocketNo. 96-2980

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 693 So. 2d 146 (J.D. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

J.D. v. State, 693 So. 2d 146, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5854, 1997 WL 280779 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

J.D. appeals from an order of restitution requiring him to pay $598.79, plus court fees for damages made to the Truman School in Monroe County. Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the trial court’s order of restitution where the damage estimates relied upon to support the restitution amount were improperly based entirely on inadmissable hearsay evidence and the defendant properly objected to its admission. See J.L. v. State, 684 So.2d 883, 884 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Louis v. State, 654 So.2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Branker v. State, 650 So.2d 195, 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Boyle v. State, 589 So.2d 1015, 1015 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Accordingly, we remand this cause for a new restitution hearing consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

J.D. appeals from an order of restitution requiring him to pay $598.79, plus court fees for damages made to the Truman School in Monroe County. Upon the State’s proper confession of error, we reverse the trial court’s order of restitution where the damage estimates relied upon to support the restitution amount were improperly based entirely on inadmissable hearsay evidence and the defendant properly objected to its admission. See J.L. v. State, 684 So.2d 883, 884 (Fla. 3d DCA 1996); Louis v. State, 654 So.2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995); Branker v. State, 650 So.2d 195, 196 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Boyle v. State, 589 So.2d 1015, 1015 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Accordingly, we remand this cause for a new restitution hearing consistent with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

693 So. 2d 146, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 5854, 1997 WL 280779, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jd-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack