Louis v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Louis v. State

654 So. 2d 1290, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5741, 1995 WL 322568

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 31, 1995

DocketNo. 94-2056

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 654 So. 2d 1290 (Louis v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Louis v. State, 654 So. 2d 1290, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5741, 1995 WL 322568 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit to most of the appellant’s points on appeal and therefore affirm the convictions and sentences below with but two exceptions. First, the judgment form must be corrected to reflect that burglary of a structure is a third degree felony. Second, the amount ordered in restitution is improperly supported only by hearsay evidence of value. See Delks v. State, 622 So.2d 624 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); House v. State, 614 So.2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Thomas v. State, 581 So.2d 992 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Hence, that portion of the restitution order is vacated and the cause remanded for a new hearing on the valuation issue alone.

Affirmed in part, vacated and remanded in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We find no merit to most of the appellant’s points on appeal and therefore affirm the convictions and sentences below with but two exceptions. First, the judgment form must be corrected to reflect that burglary of a structure is a third degree felony. Second, the amount ordered in restitution is improperly supported only by hearsay evidence of value. See Delks v. State, 622 So.2d 624 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993); House v. State, 614 So.2d 677 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993); Thomas v. State, 581 So.2d 992 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991). Hence, that portion of the restitution order is vacated and the cause remanded for a new hearing on the valuation issue alone.

Affirmed in part, vacated and remanded in part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

654 So. 2d 1290, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 5741, 1995 WL 322568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/louis-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack