Boyle v. State

589 So. 2d 1015, 1991 WL 244669
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 20, 1991·No. 91-00346·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

589 So.2d 1015 (1991)

Wanda Lee BOYLE, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 91-00346.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

November 20, 1991.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and David A. Snyder, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michele Taylor, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Because the trial court erred in setting the amount of restitution on the basis of hearsay evidence, to which the defendant properly objected, we reverse the restitution order and remand for another restitution hearing. See Thomas v. State, 581 So.2d 992 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).

SCHEB, A.C.J., and DANAHY and FRANK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Boyle v. State, 589 So. 2d 1015, 1991 WL 244669 (Fla. Ct. App. 1991).

589 So. 2d 1015 (Boyle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Herrington v. State
823 So. 2d 286 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
J.D. v. State
693 So. 2d 146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Green v. State
652 So. 2d 958 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Reynolds v. State
598 So. 2d 188 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)