Herrington v. State
823 So. 2d 286, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11394, 2002 WL 1828089
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 12, 2002·No. No. 1D01-0811·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinion
Because the trial court erred in setting the amount of restitution in favor of Ryder Trucks based on hearsay evidence to which the defendant properly objected, we reverse the restitution order in favor of Ryder and remand for another restitution [287]*287hearing. Boyle v. State, 589 So.2d 1015 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Herrington v. State, 823 So. 2d 286, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 11394, 2002 WL 1828089 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
823 So. 2d 286 (Herrington v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
CRICKET KATHLEEN TOOLE v. STATE OF FLORIDA
270 So. 3d 371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Nelson v. State
95 So. 3d 368 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
VB v. State
75 So. 3d 363 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
Forlano v. State
964 So. 2d 246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Johnson v. State
856 So. 2d 1085 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Henderson v. State
823 So. 2d 286 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)