Jarrett v. InterMune Inc.

464 F. App'x 651
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 30, 2011·No. Nos. 10-17237, 10-17239·Published·Cited by 18 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Deborah Jane Jarrett et. al., along with third-party payor Government Employees Health Association, Inc., appeal the district court’s dismissal of their proposed nationwide class action suit against InterMune, Inc., Dr. Scott Harkonen, and Genentech, Inc. Because the parties are familiar with the history of. the case, we need not recount it here.

We affirm the judgment of the district court for the reasons set forth in the district court's orders. See In re Actimmune Marketing Litig., 614 F.Supp.2d 1037 (N.D.Cal.2009) (Actimmune I); In re Actimmune Marketing Litig., No. C 08-02376 MHP, 2009 WL 3740648 (N.D.Cal. Nov.6, 2009) (Patel, J.) {Aetimmune II); In re Actimmune Marketing Litig., No. C 08-02376 MHP, 2010 WL 3463491 (N.D.Cal. Sept.l, 2010) (Patel, J.) {Aetimmune III).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jarrett v. InterMune Inc., 464 F. App'x 651 (9th Cir. 2011).

464 F. App'x 651 (Jarrett v. InterMune Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

dotStrategy Co. v. Facebook Inc
N.D. California, 2020
Snarr v. Cento Fine Foods Inc.
N.D. California, 2019
Russo v. Walgreen Co.
N.D. Illinois, 2018
Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.
243 F. Supp. 3d 1074 (N.D. California, 2017)
Opperman v. Path, Inc.
84 F. Supp. 3d 962 (N.D. California, 2015)
Bishop v. 7-Eleven, Inc.
37 F. Supp. 3d 1058 (N.D. California, 2014)
Kane v. Chobani, Inc.
973 F. Supp. 2d 1120 (N.D. California, 2014)
In re Iphone Application Litigation
6 F. Supp. 3d 1004 (N.D. California, 2013)
Wilson v. Frito-Lay North America, Inc.
961 F. Supp. 2d 1134 (N.D. California, 2013)