Jannett v. Hardie

Supreme Court

Jannett v. Hardie

290 U.S. 602, 54 S. Ct. 345, 78 L. Ed. 529, 1933 U.S. LEXIS 519

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 18, 1933

DocketNo. 168

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 290 U.S. 602 (Jannett v. Hardie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jannett v. Hardie, 290 U.S. 602, 54 S. Ct. 345, 78 L. Ed. 529, 1933 U.S. LEXIS 519 (1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The Supreme Court of Florida entertained on rehearing and decided the constitutional question as to the denial of the equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment. The judgment is affirmed. Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U.S. 22, 30, 31; Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U.S. 68, 71, 72; Budd v. New York, 143 U.S. 517, 548; Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U.S. 563; Engel v. O'Malley, 219 U.S. 128, 137, 138; Mutual Loan Co. v. Martell, 222 U.S. 225, 235, 236; Toyota v. Hawaii, 226 U.S. 184, 191, 192; Northwestern Laundry Co. v. Des Moines, 239 U.S. 486, 495; Packard v. Banton, 264 U.S. 140, 143, 144; Radice v. New York, 264 U.S. 292, 296; Dillingham v. McLaughlin, 264 U.S. 370; Ohio v. Akron Park District, 281 U.S. 74, 81.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The Supreme Court of Florida entertained on rehearing and decided the constitutional question as to the denial of the equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment. The judgment is affirmed. Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U.S. 22, 30, 31; Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U.S. 68, 71, 72; Budd v. New York, 143 U.S. 517, 548; Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U.S. 563; Engel v. O'Malley, 219 U.S. 128, 137, 138; Mutual Loan Co. v. Martell, 222 U.S. 225, 235, 236; Toyota v. Hawaii, 226 U.S. 184, 191, 192; Northwestern Laundry Co. v. Des Moines, 239 U.S. 486, 495; Packard v. Banton, 264 U.S. 140, 143, 144; Radice v. New York, 264 U.S. 292, 296; Dillingham v. McLaughlin, 264 U.S. 370; Ohio v. Akron Park District, 281 U.S. 74, 81.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 U.S. 602, 54 S. Ct. 345, 78 L. Ed. 529, 1933 U.S. LEXIS 519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jannett-v-hardie-scotus-1933.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack