Jannett v. Hardie

Supreme Court

Jannett v. Hardie

290 U.S. 602, 54 S. Ct. 345, 78 L. Ed. 529, 1933 U.S. LEXIS 519

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 18, 1933·No. No. 168·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The Supreme Court of Florida entertained on rehearing and decided the constitutional question as to the denial of the equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment. The judgment is affirmed. Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U.S. 22, 30, 31; Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U.S. 68, 71, 72; Budd v. New York, 143 U.S. 517, 548; Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U.S. 563; Engel v. O'Malley, 219 U.S. 128, 137, 138; Mutual Loan Co. v. Martell, 222 U.S. 225, 235, 236; Toyota v. Hawaii, 226 U.S. 184, 191, 192; Northwestern Laundry Co. v. Des Moines, 239 U.S. 486, 495; Packard v. Banton, 264 U.S. 140, 143, 144; Radice v. New York, 264 U.S. 292, 296; Dillingham v. McLaughlin, 264 U.S. 370; Ohio v. Akron Park District, 281 U.S. 74, 81.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The Supreme Court of Florida entertained on rehearing and decided the constitutional question as to the denial of the equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment. The judgment is affirmed. Missouri v. Lewis, 101 U.S. 22, 30, 31; Hayes v. Missouri, 120 U.S. 68, 71, 72; Budd v. New York, 143 U.S. 517, 548; Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U.S. 563; Engel v. O'Malley, 219 U.S. 128, 137, 138; Mutual Loan Co. v. Martell, 222 U.S. 225, 235, 236; Toyota v. Hawaii, 226 U.S. 184, 191, 192; Northwestern Laundry Co. v. Des Moines, 239 U.S. 486, 495; Packard v. Banton, 264 U.S. 140, 143, 144; Radice v. New York, 264 U.S. 292, 296; Dillingham v. McLaughlin, 264 U.S. 370; Ohio v. Akron Park District, 281 U.S. 74, 81.

Jannett v. Hardie, 290 U.S. 602, 54 S. Ct. 345, 78 L. Ed. 529, 1933 U.S. LEXIS 519 (1933).

Pincite

290 U.S. 602 (Jannett v. Hardie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related