Griffith v. Connecticut

218 U.S. 572, 31 S. Ct. 134, 54 L. Ed. 1155, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2051
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedDecember 12, 1910
Docket515
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 218 U.S. 572 (Griffith v. Connecticut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U.S. 572, 31 S. Ct. 134, 54 L. Ed. 1155, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2051 (1910).

Opinion

Mr. Justice White

delivered the opinion of the court.

The parties to this record are the stale as in. No. 514, just decided, ante, p. 563, and the questions involved are the same, the prosecution being for similar offenses against the Connecticut act of 1907. Both cases were tried together. Upon the conviction in this, however, the trial court imposed the penalty of imprisonment. The two cases were disposed of by the Supreme Court of Errors in one opinion. As the decision in No. 514 is necessarily controlling, it follows that the judgment -of the Supreme Court of Errors of Connecticut must be and it is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mazaika v. Bank One, Columbus, N.A.
653 A.2d 640 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Frazier v. Steel & Tube Co. of America
132 S.E. 723 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
218 U.S. 572, 31 S. Ct. 134, 54 L. Ed. 1155, 1910 U.S. LEXIS 2051, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/griffith-v-connecticut-scotus-1910.