James Williams v. Vernon L. Peppersack, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
This text of 241 F.2d 614 (James Williams v. Vernon L. Peppersack, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal in a habeas corpus proceeding by a prisoner serving a sentence of imprisonment under the judgment of a Maryland state court. Appellant was charged in the state court with a capital felony and was represented by counsel. In the course of his trial counsel withdrew his plea of not guilty and entered a plea of guilty, upon which a sentence of life imprisonment was entered. This plea appellant now says was entered without his consent, although it was entered in his presence and for the evident purpose of saving him from the death penalty. Before proceedings were instituted in the court below the same questions had been presented and heard on habeas corpus proceedings in the courts of Maryland; and there is no reason to think that appellant’s contentions were not properly considered and his rights properly adjudicated in the state courts. See Williams v. Warden, 205 Md. 633, 109 A.2d 49. The appeal must be dismissed, as there is no certificate of probable cause as required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253 and the case is not one in which a judge of this court would be justified in issuing such certificate.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
241 F.2d 614, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 3495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-williams-v-vernon-l-peppersack-warden-maryland-penitentiary-ca4-1957.