James v. State
764 So. 2d 623, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 493, 2000 WL 60906
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 706 So. 2d 64 →
Opinion
Appellant did not preserve the sentencing issues he now raises on appeal by raising objections in the trial court or by a motion to correct sentence under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.140(d). The judgment and sentence are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James v. State, 764 So. 2d 623, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 493, 2000 WL 60906 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
764 So. 2d 623 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.