James v. State

718 So. 2d 365, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12314, 1998 WL 670391
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 11587
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 1, 1998·No. No. 97-3731·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Eugene James timely appeals from an order revoking his probation following his arrest for trespassing. We affirm the order on the first two grounds stated by the court. We reverse, however, that part of the order finding as a ground for revocation that James failed to pay required supervision and court costs. As the state properly concedes, his failure to pay these costs was not an appropriate ground to revoke his probation because the trial court did not find specifically that he had the financial ability to pay. See Allen v. State, 662 So.2d 380, 381 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part.

POLEN, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. State, 718 So. 2d 365, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 12314, 1998 WL 670391 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

718 So. 2d 365 (James v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Allen v. State
662 So. 2d 380 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)