James v. State

687 So. 2d 364, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 954, 1997 WL 55689
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 12, 1997
DocketNo. 96-871
StatusPublished

This text of 687 So. 2d 364 (James v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
James v. State, 687 So. 2d 364, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 954, 1997 WL 55689 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because the State’s justifications for peremptorily challenging the prospective jurors were facially race-neutral and genuine, we affirm. See State v. Holiday, 682 So.2d 1092 (Fla.1996); Melbourne v. State, 679 So.2d 759 (Fla.1996).

Affirmed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melbourne v. State
679 So. 2d 759 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)
State v. Holiday
682 So. 2d 1092 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
687 So. 2d 364, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 954, 1997 WL 55689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.