James v. Le Roy

New York Supreme Court

James v. Le Roy

6 Johns. 274

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedAugust 15, 1810

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 6 Johns. 274 (James v. Le Roy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James v. Le Roy, 6 Johns. 274 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1810).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is the case of an apprentice, employed by the defendants, without the consent or knowledge of his master. The master is entitled to his earnings, whether the defendants did, or did not know that he was an apprentice. (1 Vez. sen. 83. 48. 1 Salk. 68. 1 Comyn on Contracts, 224, 225.) In case of a hired servant, the employer must have notice, to make himself answerable; (2 Lev. 63. 1 Black. Comm. 429.) The decision, at the circuit, was correct, and the motion for a new trial is denied.

Rule refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is the case of an apprentice, employed by the defendants, without the consent or knowledge of his master. The master is entitled to his earnings, whether the defendants did, or did not know that he was an apprentice. (1 Vez. sen. 83. 48. 1 Salk. 68. 1 Comyn on Contracts, 224, 225.) In case of a hired servant, the employer must have notice, to make himself answerable; (2 Lev. 63. 1 Black. Comm. 429.) The decision, at the circuit, was correct, and the motion for a new trial is denied.

Rule refused.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Johns. 274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-v-le-roy-nysupct-1810.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack