James v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided December 1, 2021·No. 3:21-cv-05638·Unknown

Opinion

1 2

3 4 5 6 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON

10 RACHEL JAMES, Case No. C21-5638-SKV 11 Plaintiff,

12 vs. [PROPOSED] ORDER

14 Defendant.

15 Based on the stipulation of the parties and the Declaration of Nancy Zaragoza, it is 16 ORDERED that the Commissioner’s decision in regard to Plaintiff’s application for disability 17 insurance benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act be REMANDED to the 18 Commissioner of Social Security for further administrative proceedings. 19 This Court hereby remands the Commissioner’s decision under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. 20 § 405(g), for a new hearing and decision. This Court shall retain jurisdiction of the matter, and 21 no Judgment shall be issued at this time. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 297 (1993). 22 DATED this 1st day of December, 2021.

23 A United States Magistrate Judge 1 Presented by: 2 s/ Nancy C. Zaragoza Special Assistant United States Attorney 4 Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 5 701 Fifth Avenue, Suite 2900 M/S 221A Seattle, WA 98104-7075 6 Telephone: (206) 615-3693 Fax: (206) 615-2531 7 nancy.zaragoza@ssa.gov

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

James v. Commissioner of Social Security, (W.D. Wash. 2021).

James v. Commissioner of Social Security (James v. Commissioner of Social Security) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)