James Rees & Sons Co. v. Pittsburgh & Cincinnati Packet Line

Third Circuit

James Rees & Sons Co. v. Pittsburgh & Cincinnati Packet Line

237 F. 563, 150 C.C.A. 445, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1976

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedDecember 8, 1916

DocketNo. 2163

StatusPublished

This text of 237 F. 563 (James Rees & Sons Co. v. Pittsburgh & Cincinnati Packet Line) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James Rees & Sons Co. v. Pittsburgh & Cincinnati Packet Line, 237 F. 563, 150 C.C.A. 445, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1976 (3d Cir. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

McPHERSON, Circuit Judge.

It is not necessary to discuss this appeal. The commonwealth concedes its claim to be inferior in rank to the liens that are referred to in Appeal of James Rees & Sons Co., 237 Fed. 555,-C. C. A. -, and as these are in excess of the fund for distribution there is no money to he applied to the claim now before us. We do not pass upon the merits,, therefore, but merely dismiss the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McPHERSON, Circuit Judge.

It is not necessary to discuss this appeal. The commonwealth concedes its claim to be inferior in rank to the liens that are referred to in Appeal of James Rees & Sons Co., 237 Fed. 555,-C. C. A. -, and as these are in excess of the fund for distribution there is no money to he applied to the claim now before us. We do not pass upon the merits,, therefore, but merely dismiss the appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 F. 563, 150 C.C.A. 445, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-rees-sons-co-v-pittsburgh-cincinnati-packet-line-ca3-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack