James Rees & Sons Co. v. Pittsburgh & Cincinnati Packet Line
237 F. 563, 150 C.C.A. 445, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1976
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in James Rees & Sons Co. v. Pittsburgh & Cincinnati Packet Line. Read the opinion of the Court — 237 F. 555 →
Opinion
It is not necessary to discuss this appeal. The commonwealth concedes its claim to be inferior in rank to the liens that are referred to in Appeal of James Rees & Sons Co., 237 Fed. 555,-C. C. A. -, and as these are in excess of the fund for distribution there is no money to he applied to the claim now before us. We do not pass upon the merits,, therefore, but merely dismiss the appeal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James Rees & Sons Co. v. Pittsburgh & Cincinnati Packet Line, 237 F. 563, 150 C.C.A. 445, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 1976 (3d Cir. 1916).
237 F. 563 (James Rees & Sons Co. v. Pittsburgh & Cincinnati Packet Line) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
James Rees & Sons Co. v. Pittsburgh & Cincinnati Packet Line
237 F. 555 (Third Circuit, 1916)