James P. Free, Jr. v. Howard Peters, III and Neil Hartigan
This text of 44 F.3d 435 (James P. Free, Jr. v. Howard Peters, III and Neil Hartigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Upon consideration of petitioner’s “EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION”, respondents’ “MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE OF DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF RULE 60(b) RELIEF AND OBJECTION TO EMERGENCY MOTION FOR STAY OF EXECUTION”, petitioner’s “OPPOSITION OF JAMES P. FREE, JR. TO THE STATE’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE OF DISTRICT COURT’S DENIAL OF RULE 60(b) RELIEF”, and petitioner’s “SUPPLEMENTAL SUPPORT FOR STAY OF EXECUTION AND SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION TO THE STATES’S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR SUMMARY AFFIRMANCE”,
IT IS ORDERED that the district court’s order of December 2, 1994 is SUMMARILY AFFIRMED. See Williams v. Chrans, 42 F.3d 1137 (7th Cir.1994). The motion for a stay of execution is MOOT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 F.3d 435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-p-free-jr-v-howard-peters-iii-and-neil-hartigan-ca7-1995.