James P. Free, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Respondents-Appellants/cross-Appellees
This text of 19 F.3d 389 (James P. Free, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Respondents-Appellants/cross-Appellees) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
On January 18, 1994, petitioner-appel-lee/eross-appellant filed a petition for rehearing with a suggestion of rehearing en banc. The panel majority voted to deny rehearing, Judge Cudahy dissenting. A vote of the active members of the Court was requested on the suggestion of rehearing en banc, and a majority has voted to deny a rehearing en banc.
Judges Cudahy, Ripple, and Rovner voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. A dissent from the denial of rehearing en banc follows.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
19 F.3d 389, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6039, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-p-free-jr-petitioner-appelleecross-appellant-v-howard-a-ca7-1994.