James P. Free, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Respondents-Appellants/cross-Appellees
19 F.3d 389, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6039
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided March 31, 1994·No. 92-3618, 92-3711 and 93-2517·Published·Cited by 6 cases
Opinions
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
On January 18, 1994, petitioner-appel-lee/eross-appellant filed a petition for rehearing with a suggestion of rehearing en banc. The panel majority voted to deny rehearing, Judge Cudahy dissenting. A vote of the active members of the Court was requested on the suggestion of rehearing en banc, and a majority has voted to deny a rehearing en banc.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
James P. Free, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Respondents-Appellants/cross-Appellees, 19 F.3d 389, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 6039 (7th Cir. 1994).
19 F.3d 389 (James P. Free, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Respondents-Appellants/cross-Appellees) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cantu v. State
939 S.W.2d 627 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1997)
Hernando Williams v. James Chrans and Neil F. Hartigan
50 F.3d 1356 (Seventh Circuit, 1995)
James P. Free, Jr. v. Howard Peters, III and Neil Hartigan
44 F.3d 435 (Seventh Circuit, 1995)
James P. Free, Jr., Petitioner-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Howard A. Peters, Iii, Respondents-Appellants/cross-Appellees
19 F.3d 389 (Seventh Circuit, 1994)