James McKinney v. Charles Ryan

Ninth Circuit

James McKinney v. Charles Ryan

745 F.3d 963, 2014 WL 1013859, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4834

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedMarch 12, 2014

Docket09-99018

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 745 F.3d 963 (James McKinney v. Charles Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

James McKinney v. Charles Ryan, 745 F.3d 963, 2014 WL 1013859, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4834 (9th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Silverman, Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Silverman, Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

745 F.3d 963, 2014 WL 1013859, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/james-mckinney-v-charles-ryan-ca9-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack