James McKinney v. Charles Ryan

Ninth Circuit

James McKinney v. Charles Ryan

745 F.3d 963, 2014 WL 1013859, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4834

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided March 12, 2014·No. 09-99018·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Silverman, Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges Silverman, Murguia and Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

James McKinney v. Charles Ryan, 745 F.3d 963, 2014 WL 1013859, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 4834 (9th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

745 F.3d 963 (James McKinney v. Charles Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related