Robert Poyson v. Charles Ryan

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 2, 2014
Docket10-99005
StatusPublished

This text of Robert Poyson v. Charles Ryan (Robert Poyson v. Charles Ryan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Robert Poyson v. Charles Ryan, (9th Cir. 2014).

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROBERT ALLEN POYSON, No. 10-99005 Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:04-cv-00534-NVW

CHARLES L. RYAN, ORDER Respondent-Appellee.

Filed April 2, 2014

Before: Sidney R. Thomas, Raymond C. Fisher, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The order filed November 7, 2013 is AMENDED. The order, as amended, reads as follows:

Judge Thomas has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc. Judge Ikuta has voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Fisher has so recommended.

The full court was advised of the petition for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the nonrecused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f). 2 POYSON V. RYAN

Appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, filed April 12, 2013, is DENIED.

Appellant’s petition for panel rehearing, filed April 12, 2013, remains pending. The panel will stay proceedings on the petition for panel rehearing pending resolution of en banc proceedings in McKinney v. Ryan, 730 F.3d 903 (9th Cir. 2013), rehearing en banc granted, 2014 WL 1013859 (Mar. 12, 2014).

This opinion filed at 711 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2013) is amended, and an Amended Opinion was filed concurrently with the original version of this Order.

No further petitions will be entertained.

The clerk shall stay the mandate.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

James McKinney v. Charles Ryan
730 F.3d 903 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)
James McKinney v. Charles Ryan
745 F.3d 963 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)
Poyson v. Ryan
711 F.3d 1087 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Robert Poyson v. Charles Ryan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/robert-poyson-v-charles-ryan-ca9-2014.