Graham S Henry v. Charles Ryan

Ninth Circuit

Graham S Henry v. Charles Ryan

766 F.3d 1059, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17271, 2014 WL 4397948

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided September 4, 2014·No. 09-99007·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The April 8, 2014, three judge panel order denying Henry’s motion to reconsider the panel’s November 1, 2013, order denying the petition for panel rehearing shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges MURGUIA and FRIEDLAND did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule 35-3. The April 8, 2014, three judge panel order denying Henry’s motion to reconsider the panel’s November 1, 2013, order denying the petition for panel rehearing shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Judges MURGUIA and FRIEDLAND did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Graham S Henry v. Charles Ryan, 766 F.3d 1059, 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17271, 2014 WL 4397948 (9th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

766 F.3d 1059 (Graham S Henry v. Charles Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related