Jaime Perez-Enriquez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General

436 F.3d 1097, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2236, 2006 WL 229928
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 30, 2006
Docket03-70244
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 436 F.3d 1097 (Jaime Perez-Enriquez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jaime Perez-Enriquez v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General, 436 F.3d 1097, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2236, 2006 WL 229928 (9th Cir. 2006).

Opinion

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
436 F.3d 1097, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 2236, 2006 WL 229928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jaime-perez-enriquez-v-alberto-r-gonzales-attorney-general-ca9-2006.