Jacob Lichter and Jennie Lichter, D/B/A the Southern Fireproofing Company v. B. Mifflin Hood Company

198 F.2d 472, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3194
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedMay 19, 1952
Docket11370_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 198 F.2d 472 (Jacob Lichter and Jennie Lichter, D/B/A the Southern Fireproofing Company v. B. Mifflin Hood Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jacob Lichter and Jennie Lichter, D/B/A the Southern Fireproofing Company v. B. Mifflin Hood Company, 198 F.2d 472, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3194 (6th Cir. 1952).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs, and oral argument of counsel for respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that the findings of fact of the District Judge,, as set out in his Memorandum Opinion of November 22, 1950, 106 F.Supp. 220, are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous;

And the Court agreeing with the conclusions of law applicable thereto as also set forth in said Memorandum Opinion; Travelers Ins. Co. v. Sides, 184 Tenn. 663, 202 S.W.2d 815; Lytle v. Clopton, 149 Tenn. 655, 261 S.W. 664; Helms & Willis v. Uni-coi County, 166 Tenn. 639, 64 S.W.2d 200.

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
198 F.2d 472, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jacob-lichter-and-jennie-lichter-dba-the-southern-fireproofing-company-ca6-1952.