Jacob Lichter and Jennie Lichter, D/B/A the Southern Fireproofing Company v. B. Mifflin Hood Company

198 F.2d 472, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3194
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided May 19, 1952·No. 11370_1·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was heard upon the record, briefs, and oral argument of counsel for respective parties;

And the Court being of the opinion that the findings of fact of the District Judge,, as set out in his Memorandum Opinion of November 22, 1950, 106 F.Supp. 220, are supported by the evidence and are not clearly erroneous;

And the Court agreeing with the conclusions of law applicable thereto as also set forth in said Memorandum Opinion; Travelers Ins. Co. v. Sides, 184 Tenn. 663, 202 S.W.2d 815; Lytle v. Clopton, 149 Tenn. 655, 261 S.W. 664; Helms & Willis v. Uni-coi County, 166 Tenn. 639, 64 S.W.2d 200.

It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jacob Lichter and Jennie Lichter, D/B/A the Southern Fireproofing Company v. B. Mifflin Hood Company, 198 F.2d 472, 1952 U.S. App. LEXIS 3194 (6th Cir. 1952).

198 F.2d 472 (Jacob Lichter and Jennie Lichter, D/B/A the Southern Fireproofing Company v. B. Mifflin Hood Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related