Jackson v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

60 A.2d 524, 190 Md. 748, 1948 Md. LEXIS 326
CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland
DecidedFebruary 18, 1948
Docket[H.C. No. 25, October Term, 1947.]
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 60 A.2d 524 (Jackson v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jackson v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 60 A.2d 524, 190 Md. 748, 1948 Md. LEXIS 326 (Md. 1948).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus.

The two petitioners in this case were tried and convicted in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County for rape. They were sentenced to ten years in the Maryland House of Correction. They contend that they were convicted without due process of law, in that a certain *749 letter from a Dr. Reuben Andres was offered by the State, and, as this witness did not testify, they were not confronted by this witness. They also urge that the evidence was legally insufficient to convict.

The petition alleges in response to a letter written by them, the State’s Attorney for Prince George’s County wrote them that he had no recollection of having read any letter to the court from Dr. Reuben Andres, of Gallagher Hospital (Washington, D. C.). It is not stated what it contained. If any such letter was offered in evidence, the correct procedure was to object to it, and if admitted in evidence, the remedy would have been to appeal to this court. This was not done. A writ of habeas corpus cannot be used to review a trial court’s finding on the evidence that a prisoner is guilty. It does not appear from the petition that the petitioners were denied a fundamental right. They do not complain that they were without counsel to defend them. See authority below. 1

Application denied, without costs.

1

Blundon v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 190 Md. 740, 60 A. 2d 524.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bonsuk v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
100 A.2d 645 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Daisey v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
98 A.2d 99 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
State Ex Rel. Celetano v. Wright
63 A.2d 635 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1949)
Sembly v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
60 A.2d 526 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1948)
Goodman v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
60 A.2d 527 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1948)
De Berry v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
60 A.2d 525 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 A.2d 524, 190 Md. 748, 1948 Md. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-warden-of-maryland-house-of-correction-md-1948.