Blundon v. Warden
This text of 60 A.2d 524 (Blundon v. Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus.
This man claims that he was charged with assault before a magistrate in Hyattsville, Maryland, and was sentenced to eighteen months on each charge. He says that the only witnesses were two girls and that all they accused him of doing was kissing them. He also says that *Page 741
he was committed as Lawrence L. Blundon, while his true name is Lawrence F. Blundon. The questions of guilt or innocence and the sufficiency of the evidence cannot be retried on habeas corpus.Rountree v. Warden,
Application denied, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.2d 524, 190 Md. 740, 1947 Md. LEXIS 390, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/blundon-v-warden-md-1947.