De Berry v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
This text of 60 A.2d 525 (De Berry v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application for leave to appeal from refusal of a writ of habeas corpus.
Petitioner states:
1. He was denied the right to take the stand in his own behalf;
2. That he was convicted by his own personal property;
3. That he can show that a witness, Clarke, made a different statement before the magistrate than he did in court;
4. He wants to show in this proceeding his innocence.
In his brief, he restates his innocence (A) , objects to evidence that was admitted; declares “Earnest Clarke did do the killing. I know cause I am the man who pulled him off the dying man.”
There is no allegation in the petition to show he was denied the right to take the stand in his behalf or asked the court' to take the stand. (B) Rulings on evidence admitted in the trial of a criminal case, or other rulings reviewable on appeal ordinarily, will not be reviewed in a habeas corpus proceeding. (A) If the petitioner feels he has been dealt with unjustly, he may appeal to the Executive Department.
Application denied, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 A.2d 525, 190 Md. 742, 1948 Md. LEXIS 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/de-berry-v-warden-of-maryland-penitentiary-md-1948.