Jackson v. United States

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-8226

EUGENE ERNST JACKSON,

Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent – Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (1:09-cv-02778-WMN; 1:01-cr-00464-WMN)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 7, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eugene Ernst Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Joseph Leotta, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eugene Ernst Jackson appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for Writ of Audita Querela pursuant to

the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm

for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. United

States, Nos. 1:09-cv-02778-WMN; 1:01-cr-00464-WMN (D. Md.

Oct. 28, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED