Jackson v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Jackson v. United States

381 F. App'x 308

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 245 F. App'x 258 →

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 7, 2010·No. No. 09-8226·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Ernst Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for Writ of Audita Querela pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. United States, Nos. 1:09-cv02778-WMN; 1:01-cr-00464-WMN, 2009 WL 3633342 (D.Md. Oct. 28, 2009). We [309]*309dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Eugene Ernst Jackson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for Writ of Audita Querela pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. United States, Nos. 1:09-cv02778-WMN; 1:01-cr-00464-WMN, 2009 WL 3633342 (D.Md. Oct. 28, 2009). We [309]*309dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Jackson v. United States, 381 F. App'x 308 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

381 F. App'x 308 (Jackson v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related