Jackson v. State

525 S.W.3d 172, 2017 WL 3480728, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 773
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 535 S.W.3d 374
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 15, 2017·No. No. ED 104337·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Donnie Jackson (“Appellant”) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his motion for post-conviction DNA testing without an evidentiary hearing. Appellant argues that a laboratory report admitted during trial violated his confrontation clause rights. He further argues that the State made DNA testing unavailable to him prior to trial by withholding his blood test results and failing to disclose its intent to use his blood test results at trial. We affirm the judgment of the motion court.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and have determined that an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 525 S.W.3d 172, 2017 WL 3480728, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 773 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

525 S.W.3d 172 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.