Jackson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jackson v. State

505 S.W.3d 354, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1134, 2016 WL 6596062

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 8, 2016·No. NO. ED 104047·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael Jackson appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying his motion seeking an inquiry into abandonment by counsel and re-opening of Rule 29.15 post-con[355] viction proceedings. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for- their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Michael Jackson appeals the circuit court’s judgment denying his motion seeking an inquiry into abandonment by counsel and re-opening of Rule 29.15 post-con[355] viction proceedings. Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for- their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Jackson v. State, 505 S.W.3d 354, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1134, 2016 WL 6596062 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

505 S.W.3d 354 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.