Jackson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jackson v. State

464 S.W.3d 575, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 709, 2015 WL 4082851

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 174 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 2015·No. WD 77397·Published

Opinion

Order

Per Curiam:

Alphonse D. Jackson appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court'of- Jackson County, Missouri, denying, after an evi-dentiary hearing,’ his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. On appeal, Mr. Jacksqn claims that the circuit court clearly erred in denying his motion because his trial counsel .was ineffective. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a separate memoránduifi of law to the parties explaining our ruling. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order

Per Curiam:

Alphonse D. Jackson appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court'of- Jackson County, Missouri, denying, after an evi-dentiary hearing,’ his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15. On appeal, Mr. Jacksqn claims that the circuit court clearly erred in denying his motion because his trial counsel .was ineffective. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a separate memoránduifi of law to the parties explaining our ruling. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Jackson v. State, 464 S.W.3d 575, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 709, 2015 WL 4082851 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

464 S.W.3d 575 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.