Jackson v. State

389 S.W.3d 298, 2013 WL 152444, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 50
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 719
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 15, 2013·No. No. WD 74578·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Terrance Jackson pleaded guilty to robbery in the second degree. He subsequently filed a motion for post-conviction relief under Supreme Court Rule 24.035, which the circuit court denied without an evidentiary hearing. Jackson appeals, arguing that his plea was not knowing and voluntary because: (1) he was under the influence of illegal drugs that prevented him from understanding the plea proceedings; (2) his counsel pressured him to plead guilty; and (3) his counsel misad-vised him as to the operation of a “120-day call-back” under § 559.115, RSMo. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for [299]*299this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 389 S.W.3d 298, 2013 WL 152444, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 50 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

389 S.W.3d 298 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.