Jackson v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Jackson v. State

350 S.W.3d 68, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1317, 2011 WL 4790763

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 11, 2011·No. ED 95852·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*69 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Darían Jackson, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*69 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The movant, Darían Jackson, appeals the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentia-ry hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 29.15(k). An opinion would have no precedential value. We have provided the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s order denying the movant’s Rule 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Jackson v. State, 350 S.W.3d 68, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1317, 2011 WL 4790763 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

350 S.W.3d 68 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related