Jackson v. State

280 S.W.3d 101, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 33, 2009 WL 113855
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1674
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided January 20, 2009·No. No. ED 91315·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Michael Jackson (“movant”) appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 29.15 without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims he was denied effective assistance of counsel, and therefore, he was entitled to relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 280 S.W.3d 101, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 33, 2009 WL 113855 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

280 S.W.3d 101 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.