Jackson v. State

712 So. 2d 467, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7988, 1998 WL 347118
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 1, 1998·No. No. 97-1322·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Lawrence Jackson, was tried by jury and convicted of two counts of robbery with a firearm. We affirm in all respects, but remand with instructions that the trial court clarify the sentencing order to reflect that the mandatory minimum sentences imposed pursuant to the violent habitual felony offender statute, section 775.084(4)(b)l, Florida Statutes, and the three-year mandatory minimum for use of the firearm during the robberies, section 775.087(2), are to run concurrently not only as to each offense, but as to each other. See Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla.1995). The appellant need not be present for the correction of the sentencing order.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for clarification of the sentencing order.

STONE, C.J., and STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 712 So. 2d 467, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 7988, 1998 WL 347118 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

712 So. 2d 467 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tunsil v. State
797 So. 2d 651 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Florczak v. State
712 So. 2d 467 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)