Jackson v. State

686 So. 2d 4, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 736, 1996 WL 34855
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Jackson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 615 So. 2d 850
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1996·No. No. 95-04371·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Garvin Jackson appeals the summary denial of his motions to define or clarify sentence and his motion to correct sentence filed in trial court case number 94-20338.1 As the motions are unsworn, they must be treated as motions to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The present sentence is not illegal; therefore, the order denying the motions is affirmed without prejudice for Jackson to file a timely motion for postconviction relief in accordance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.2

Affirmed.

DANAHY, A.C.J., and PATTERSON and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jackson v. State, 686 So. 2d 4, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 736, 1996 WL 34855 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

686 So. 2d 4 (Jackson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.