Jackson v. State
This text of 686 So. 2d 4 (Jackson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Garvin Jackson appeals the summary denial of his motions to define or clarify sentence and his motion to correct sentence filed in trial court case number 94-20338.1 As the motions are unsworn, they must be treated as motions to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800. The present sentence is not illegal; therefore, the order denying the motions is affirmed without prejudice for Jackson to file a timely motion for postconviction relief in accordance with Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.2
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
686 So. 2d 4, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 736, 1996 WL 34855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jackson-v-state-fladistctapp-1996.