J. Geils Band Employee Benefit Plan v. Smith Barney Shearson, Inc.
519 U.S. 823, 117 S. Ct. 81, 136 L. Ed. 2d 39, 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2192, 65 U.S.L.W. 3257, 1996 U.S. LEXIS 4832
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 7, 1996
DocketNo. 95-2050
StatusPublished
Cited by33 cases
This text of 519 U.S. 823 (J. Geils Band Employee Benefit Plan v. Smith Barney Shearson, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
J. Geils Band Employee Benefit Plan v. Smith Barney Shearson, Inc., 519 U.S. 823, 117 S. Ct. 81, 136 L. Ed. 2d 39, 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2192, 65 U.S.L.W. 3257, 1996 U.S. LEXIS 4832 (1996).
Opinion
C. A. 1st Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
International Outdoor Inc v. City of Livonia
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2016
Dublin Eye Associates, P.C. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
957 F. Supp. 2d 843 (E.D. Kentucky, 2013)
Price v. Howard
2010 OK 26 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 2010)
Casciani v. Nesbitt
659 F. Supp. 2d 427 (W.D. New York, 2009)
Adams v. the Brink's Co.
420 F. Supp. 2d 523 (W.D. Virginia, 2006)
United States v. A) $58,920.00 in U.S. Currency
385 F. Supp. 2d 144 (D. Puerto Rico, 2005)
Rivera Sanfeliz v. Chase Manhattan Bank
349 F. Supp. 2d 240 (D. Puerto Rico, 2004)
New England Health Care Employees Pension Fund, on Behalf of Itself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Ernst & Young, LLP
336 F.3d 495 (Sixth Circuit, 2003)
Lucas v. People's Counsel for Baltimore County
807 A.2d 1176 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 2002)
State Treasurer of the State of Michigan, Public School Employees' Retirement System, Custodian of v. Harold v. Barry, Barry n.p.-500, L.P.
168 F.3d 8 (Eleventh Circuit, 1999)
Evans v. Rudy-Luther Toyota, Inc.
39 F. Supp. 2d 1177 (D. Minnesota, 1999)
Smith v. Zoning Hearing Bd. of Conewago Township
713 A.2d 1210 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
Dugan v. Smerwick Sewerage Company
142 F.3d 398 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
Dugan v. Smerwick Sewerage Co.
142 F.3d 398 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
In the Matter Of: Gary D. Reuscher, Debtor-Appellee Appeal Of: Energy Products Engineering, Inc., William J. Boyle, and Sidney A. Gould
139 F.3d 902 (Seventh Circuit, 1998)
Tanis v. Township of Hampton
704 A.2d 62 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1997)
United States v. Hebert
131 F.3d 514 (Fifth Circuit, 1997)
Cooperativa De Ahorro Y Credito Aguada v. Kidder, Peabody & Co.
129 F.3d 222 (First Circuit, 1997)
S. Cal. Gas Co. v. Cal. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Bd.
58 Cal. App. 4th 200 (California Court of Appeal, 1997)
Steinke v. Sungard Financial Systems, Inc.
121 F.3d 763 (First Circuit, 1997)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
519 U.S. 823, 117 S. Ct. 81, 136 L. Ed. 2d 39, 20 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2192, 65 U.S.L.W. 3257, 1996 U.S. LEXIS 4832, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/j-geils-band-employee-benefit-plan-v-smith-barney-shearson-inc-scotus-1996.