Izquierdo v. Miramar Motors, Inc.

155 So. 2d 420, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3405
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 30, 1963·No. No. 63-301·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks review of an order dismissing her complaint and cause in the lower court by certiorari proceedings.1

It is apparent that the order, review of which is sought by petitioner, is final in nature. See: Howard Johnson, Inc. of Florida v. State Road Department of Florida, Fla.1956, 90 So.2d 306; Womack v. Goldberg, Fla.App.1960, 117 So.2d 758. Therefore, there being an adequate remedy by appeal [See: Wieczorek v. Williams, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 262; Burdine’s, Inc. v. Drennon, Fla.1957, 97 So.2d 259; Hastings v. Osius, Fla.1958, 104 So.2d 21] the petition for certiorari is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Izquierdo v. Miramar Motors, Inc., 155 So. 2d 420, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3405 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

155 So. 2d 420 (Izquierdo v. Miramar Motors, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Employers Fire Insurance Company v. Blanchard
234 So. 2d 381 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Cicero ex rel. Cicero v. Paradis
167 So. 2d 247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Washington SEC. Co. v. Tracy's Plumbing & Pumps, Inc.
166 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)