Izquierdo v. Miramar Motors, Inc.

155 So. 2d 420, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3405
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 30, 1963
DocketNo. 63-301
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 155 So. 2d 420 (Izquierdo v. Miramar Motors, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Izquierdo v. Miramar Motors, Inc., 155 So. 2d 420, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3405 (Fla. Ct. App. 1963).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner seeks review of an order dismissing her complaint and cause in the lower court by certiorari proceedings.1

It is apparent that the order, review of which is sought by petitioner, is final in nature. See: Howard Johnson, Inc. of Florida v. State Road Department of Florida, Fla.1956, 90 So.2d 306; Womack v. Goldberg, Fla.App.1960, 117 So.2d 758. Therefore, there being an adequate remedy by appeal [See: Wieczorek v. Williams, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 262; Burdine’s, Inc. v. Drennon, Fla.1957, 97 So.2d 259; Hastings v. Osius, Fla.1958, 104 So.2d 21] the petition for certiorari is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Employers Fire Insurance Company v. Blanchard
234 So. 2d 381 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)
Cicero ex rel. Cicero v. Paradis
167 So. 2d 247 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
Washington SEC. Co. v. Tracy's Plumbing & Pumps, Inc.
166 So. 2d 680 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 So. 2d 420, 1963 Fla. App. LEXIS 3405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/izquierdo-v-miramar-motors-inc-fladistctapp-1963.