Hastings v. Osius

Supreme Court of Florida

Hastings v. Osius

101 So. 2d 37, 1958 Fla. LEXIS 1629

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMarch 5, 1958

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 101 So. 2d 37 (Hastings v. Osius) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hastings v. Osius, 101 So. 2d 37, 1958 Fla. LEXIS 1629 (Fla. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition for certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District, is granted. 97 So.2d 623.

The cause is hereby ordered placed on the oral argument calendar to be heard in due course. No further record or briefs arc required.

Argument shall be limited to the question of whether the decision of the District Court is in direct conflict with the decision of this Court in Slatcoff v. Dezen, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 800, and similar -cases holding that certiorari will not issue to review an order or judgment which may be brought to the appellate court for review on a direct appeal.

TERRELL, C. J., and HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI