Hastings v. Osius

101 So. 2d 37, 1958 Fla. LEXIS 1629
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 5, 1958·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petition for certiorari to the District Court of Appeal, Third District, is granted. 97 So.2d 623.

The cause is hereby ordered placed on the oral argument calendar to be heard in due course. No further record or briefs arc required.

Argument shall be limited to the question of whether the decision of the District Court is in direct conflict with the decision of this Court in Slatcoff v. Dezen, Fla.1954, 72 So.2d 800, and similar -cases holding that certiorari will not issue to review an order or judgment which may be brought to the appellate court for review on a direct appeal.

TERRELL, C. J., and HOBSON, ROBERTS, DREW and THORNAL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hastings v. Osius, 101 So. 2d 37, 1958 Fla. LEXIS 1629 (Fla. 1958).

101 So. 2d 37 (Hastings v. Osius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company v. Barrett
101 So. 2d 37 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)