Cicero ex rel. Cicero v. Paradis

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cicero ex rel. Cicero v. Paradis

167 So. 2d 247

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 5, 1964·No. No. 4921·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs have appealed an order dismissing their complaint and cause in a negligence action. Appellees urge on their motion to dismiss the appeal that the order is non-appealable under Shotkin v. Deehl, Fla.App.1963, 148 So.2d 538; Baker v. Colley, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 473; Rule 3.2 (b) Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. This contention is without merit. The trial court not only dismissed the complaint but also dismissed the cause, and therefore the order is final and appealable. See Izquierdo v. Miramar Motors, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 420 and cases therein cited. Appel-lees’ motions to dismiss and quash the appeal are denied.

SMITPI, C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs have appealed an order dismissing their complaint and cause in a negligence action. Appellees urge on their motion to dismiss the appeal that the order is non-appealable under Shotkin v. Deehl, Fla.App.1963, 148 So.2d 538; Baker v. Colley, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 473; Rule 3.2 (b) Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. This contention is without merit. The trial court not only dismissed the complaint but also dismissed the cause, and therefore the order is final and appealable. See Izquierdo v. Miramar Motors, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 420 and cases therein cited. Appel-lees’ motions to dismiss and quash the appeal are denied.

SMITPI, C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ, concur.

Cicero ex rel. Cicero v. Paradis, 167 So. 2d 247 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

167 So. 2d 247 (Cicero ex rel. Cicero v. Paradis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related