Cicero ex rel. Cicero v. Paradis
This text of 167 So. 2d 247 (Cicero ex rel. Cicero v. Paradis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs have appealed an order dismissing their complaint and cause in a negligence action. Appellees urge on their motion to dismiss the appeal that the order is non-appealable under Shotkin v. Deehl, Fla.App.1963, 148 So.2d 538; Baker v. Colley, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 473; Rule 3.2 (b) Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. This contention is without merit. The trial court not only dismissed the complaint but also dismissed the cause, and therefore the order is final and appealable. See Izquierdo v. Miramar Motors, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 420 and cases therein cited. Appel-lees’ motions to dismiss and quash the appeal are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 So. 2d 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cicero-ex-rel-cicero-v-paradis-fladistctapp-1964.