Cicero ex rel. Cicero v. Paradis

167 So. 2d 247
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 5, 1964
DocketNo. 4921
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 167 So. 2d 247 (Cicero ex rel. Cicero v. Paradis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cicero ex rel. Cicero v. Paradis, 167 So. 2d 247 (Fla. Ct. App. 1964).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs have appealed an order dismissing their complaint and cause in a negligence action. Appellees urge on their motion to dismiss the appeal that the order is non-appealable under Shotkin v. Deehl, Fla.App.1963, 148 So.2d 538; Baker v. Colley, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 473; Rule 3.2 (b) Florida Appellate Rules, 31 F.S.A. This contention is without merit. The trial court not only dismissed the complaint but also dismissed the cause, and therefore the order is final and appealable. See Izquierdo v. Miramar Motors, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 155 So.2d 420 and cases therein cited. Appel-lees’ motions to dismiss and quash the appeal are denied.

SMITPI, C. J., and SHANNON and WHITE, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Raphael v. Carner
194 So. 2d 298 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 So. 2d 247, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cicero-ex-rel-cicero-v-paradis-fladistctapp-1964.