Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London

107 N.Y.S. 81
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 A.D. 56

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order appealed from must be reversed, in so far as appealed from by plaintiff, and the seventh, eighth, and ninth interrogatories to be addressed to Sir Neville Lubbock, William N. Whymper, and E. H. Britton allowed and settled as originally proposed by plaintiffs.

The order must be affirmed, in so far as appealed from by defendant, and the third, fourth, fifth, sixth, eleventh, twelfth, thirteenth, fourteenth, fifteenth, and sixteenth interrogatories proposed to be propounded to the above-named witnesses, and the fourth interrogatory to be addressed to the witness H. B. Guernsey allowed and settled, with $10 costs and disbursements to the plaintiffs, appellants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London, 107 N.Y.S. 81 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

107 N.Y.S. 81 (Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.