Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London

122 A.D. 886

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 15, 1907

DocketNo. 1

StatusPublished

This text of 122 A.D. 886 (Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London, 122 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The order appealed from must be reversed in. so far as appealed from by plaintiffs, and the 7th, 8th and 9th interrogatories to be addressed to Sir Neville Lubbock, William N. Whymper and E. H. Britton allowed and. settled as originally proposed by plaintiffs. The order must be affirmed in so far as appealed from, by defendant, and the 3d, 4th, 5th, 6th, 11th,■ 12th, 18th, 14th, 15th [887]*887and 16th interrogatories proposed to be propounded" to the above-named witnesses, and the 4th interrogatory to be addressed to the witness H. O. Guernsey, allowed and settled, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiffs, appellants. Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, McLaughlin, Houghton and Scott, JJ. On plaintiffs’ appeal, order reversed and order entered as stated in opinion; on defendant’s appeal, order affirmed, and order entered as stated in opinion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to plaintiffs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

The order appealed from must be reversed in. so far as appealed from by plaintiffs, and the 7th, 8th and 9th interrogatories to be addressed to Sir Neville Lubbock, William N. Whymper and E. H. Britton allowed and. settled as originally proposed by plaintiffs. The order must be affirmed in so far as appealed from, by defendant, and the 3d, 4th, 5th, 6th, 11th,■ 12th, 18th, 14th, 15th [887]*887and 16th interrogatories proposed to be propounded" to the above-named witnesses, and the 4th interrogatory to be addressed to the witness H. O. Guernsey, allowed and settled, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiffs, appellants. Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, McLaughlin, Houghton and Scott, JJ. On plaintiffs’ appeal, order reversed and order entered as stated in opinion; on defendant’s appeal, order affirmed, and order entered as stated in opinion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to plaintiffs. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

122 A.D. 886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/irving-v-royal-exchange-assurance-of-london-nyappdiv-1907.