Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London

122 A.D. 886
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London. Read the opinion of the Court — 122 A.D. 56
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1907·No. No. 1·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam :

The order appealed from must be reversed in. so far as appealed from by plaintiffs, and the 7th, 8th and 9th interrogatories to be addressed to Sir Neville Lubbock, William N. Whymper and E. H. Britton allowed and. settled as originally proposed by plaintiffs. The order must be affirmed in so far as appealed from, by defendant, and the 3d, 4th, 5th, 6th, 11th,■ 12th, 18th, 14th, 15th [887]*887and 16th interrogatories proposed to be propounded" to the above-named witnesses, and the 4th interrogatory to be addressed to the witness H. O. Guernsey, allowed and settled, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the plaintiffs, appellants. Present — Patterson, P. J., Ingraham, McLaughlin, Houghton and Scott, JJ. On plaintiffs’ appeal, order reversed and order entered as stated in opinion; on defendant’s appeal, order affirmed, and order entered as stated in opinion, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to plaintiffs. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London, 122 A.D. 886 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

122 A.D. 886 (Irving v. Royal Exchange Assurance of London) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.