Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc.

87 F. App'x 180
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided January 21, 2004·No. No. 99-1584, 00-1005·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Order for the court filed PER CURIAM. Dissenting order filed by SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

Upon consideration of the remand order of the Supreme Court, Insituform Techs., Inc. v. CAT Contr., Inc., 535 U.S. 1108, 122 S.Ct. 2322, 153 L.Ed.2d 151 (2002),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, 90-CV-1690, is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S. 722, 122 S.Ct. 1831, 152 L.Ed.2d 944 (2002), and Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 344 F.3d 1359 (Fed.Cir.2003) (en banc).

SCHALL, Circuit Judge, dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc., 87 F. App'x 180 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

87 F. App'x 180 (Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related