Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc.

87 F. App'x 180

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 21, 2004

DocketNo. 99-1584, 00-1005

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 87 F. App'x 180 (Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Insituform Technologies, Inc. v. Cat Contracting, Inc., 87 F. App'x 180 (Fed. Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Order for the court filed PER CURIAM. Dissenting order filed by SCHALL, Circuit Judge.

Upon consideration of the remand order of the Supreme Court, Insituform Techs., Inc. v. CAT Contr., Inc., 535 U.S. 1108, 122 S.Ct. 2322, 153 L.Ed.2d 151 (2002),

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, 90-CV-1690, is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for reconsideration in light of Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S. 722, 122 S.Ct. 1831, 152 L.Ed.2d 944 (2002), and Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 344 F.3d 1359 (Fed.Cir.2003) (en banc).

SCHALL, Circuit Judge, dissenting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI